PO Box 159
Cotopaxi, CO 81223
(719) 942-4353
Fax: (719) 942-4358

Producer Workshops
    Minnesota
    Nebraska
EWS Newsletter
Participating States
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Colorado
    Idaho
    Indiana
    Iowa
    Maine
    Maryland
    Michigan
    Mississippi
    New York
    North Carolina
    Ohio
    Oregon
Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Texas
    Utah
    Washington
    Wisconsin


DOE Ethanol Workshop Series

Pennsylvania Ethanol Workshop
Ethanol for a cleaner, more prosperous Pennsylvania

September 19, 2000
9:00 am to 2:00 pm

Holiday Inn Harrisburg/Hershey
Grantville, Pennsylvania

SUMMARY

Pennsylvania Ethanol Workshop
Harrisburg/Hershey, Pennsylvania
September 14, 2000


ATTENDEES

About 60 people attended the Pennsylvania Ethanol Workshop held at the Holiday Inn in Grantville. Approximately 45% represented government agencies, 40 % private companies, 10% associations and the balance from academia.

THE WORKSHOP

The theme for the workshop was “Ethanol for a cleaner, more prosperous Pennsylvania.” The focus for the Pennsylvania Workshop was value-added, economic development in rural areas and enhancing the agricultural climate in the state while at the same time improving the environment. The emcees for the workshop were Dave Bingaman, Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture, and Susan Summers, Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection.

Sam Hayes, Pennsylvania Secretary of Agriculture, welcomed the delegates and explained the need for value-added processing in Pennsylvania. Mr. Hayes expressed his department’s commitment to support development of an ethanol industry in the state. Robert Harris, Special Assistant, Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, U.S. DOE, informed the group of the opportunities offered by the Federal Bioenergy Initiative. It is a goal of the US DOE to increase the use of bioenergy three-fold by 2010. Bob Dinneen, Vice President of the Renewable Fuels Association, comprehensively reviewed the environmental significance of ethanol use. Mr. Dinneen also addressed the need for domestic energy security especially in light of the current oil shortage and stronghold that Iraq and the other middle-eastern countries once again have over the United States. He asked the audience in whom they would rather place their trust and future – Saddam Hussein or the Pennsylvania farmer?

Following a networking lunch, concurrent sessions were held. One focused on ethanol use and the marketplace. Considerable discussion was held on the future and logistics of E85, including the increasing improvements in the infrastructure for refueling. One company based in Florida offers a mobile fueling service for fleets, thus potentially reducing the need for some stationary fueling stations. The potential demand for ethanol that may be generated through the use of Ediesel is over 400,000,000 gallons annually. The second session discussed the production aspects of ethanol and the significance to the state. Feedstocks, both agricultural and forestry residue, were overviewed to show where the greatest potential might be. The production technologies for grain are now state-of-the-art, whereas cellulose technology is not quite yet ready for commercialization. Cellulose technology is approximately where grain technology was 20 years ago, so it’s level of sophistication will only go upward. Also, very important to helping grow an industry in the state are the current applicable in-state incentive programs. At the end of the concurrent sessions, discussion leaders, Michelle Knapik, Clean Cities Philadelphia, and Rick Handley, NRBP, respectively, asked their participants to gather together in one group again and share an overview of what each session had discussed.

WHERE DO WE GO FROM HERE?

In the concluding group discussion, several activities were identified that will help with the investigation of how to develop an ethanol industry in the state:

Organize a task force or steering committee to keep the momentum going. That committee will then address all barriers and challenges that arise, prioritize them and determine what action are necessary. That meeting will be held in the near future in order to start developing a pathway from potential near-term grain-ethanol to longer-term cellulose ethanol.

Work with Penn State about how the numbers have changed on ethanol production from corn, possibly holding a farm summit

Learn what the potential for new cellulose ethanol technology for “lignin washing” that would help with biomass co-firing

Investigate what the potential for increased farm productivity from “wet grains” is.

The committee/task force should work with state Economic Development to evaluate state incentives

Form a coalition with similar needs should be sought out and formed.


 


Company Info